Shrimpton – Je Suis Charlie

Posted by Michael Shrimpton on February 1, 2015

The Charlie Hebdo and associated attacks were carried out by murderous Islamic terrorists… for once an official French version of events is actually fairly accurate.



The murderous Islamic terrorist attack on January 7th on the offices of the French satirical journal Charlie Hebdo has already faded from the headlines. The inevitable conspiracy theories have already started circulating, suggesting that either there wasn’t an attack at all, or that if there was, it wasn’t perpetrated by Moslems.

Get used to it. The Charlie Hebdo and associated attacks were carried out by murderous Islamic terrorists. For once an official French version of events is actually fairly accurate.

The Bad Guys have made a major miscalculation. The Germans might even lose control of France. The major political beneficiary will most likely be Marine Le Pen, the only French politician to have made meaningful proposals for reform since the attacks.

In an unusual development some journalists actually asked an intelligent question – how come the terrorist Kouachi brothers had their surveillance lifted? The answer is obvious of course. The Fifth Republic is essentially Vichyist. The most powerful organisation in France is the DVD’s black agency in Paris, successor to the Abwehr organisation in France, which included Petain.

Spyhunter, so far as I know, was the first publication anywhere to reveal the existence of this agency. Sadly, sales have not taken off. There hasn’t been a single order from France, to my knowledge. The result is that the French public and media live in ignorance of how their state actually functions.


The Charlie attack thus came as a great shock. Since Islamic terrorism is ultimately controlled from Dachau, of course Islamic terrorists are going to be protected by penetrated intelligence agencies in the West.

The Jerries made desperate efforts to protect the Kouachi brothers, ensuring they had an exit and forcing police to scale down the manhunt. Fortunately it was to no avail, and they were taken down. Their deaths revealed a weakness in Germany’s covert control of the Fifth Republic. The post 1945 model for German domination of Europe requires suppression of the truth. The black agency in Paris has to stay deep. That means that from time to time it will lose control of events. Great.

Will anything be done?

Of course not. The meaningless platitudes offered by President Hollande, Prime Minister Cameron and others were just that – meaningless platitudes. They condemned the attack, but failed utterly to offer any constructive policy suggestions.

Neither leader is prepared to stand up to Germany. In that they reflect the failed leaders of the Third Republic, who so cravenly caved in to Germany in 1940, making sure that the French Army, e.g. did not have sufficient armor (the French actually had more tanks than the Germans, but many were held back).

I don’t agree with all of Marine Le Pen’s policies, but she is the only active French politician prepared to stand up for France. If she is elected in 2017, and the Jerries don’t assassinate her, then we might see some action.

Phase Five of the War on Terror


The attacks and their aftermath seem to me to mark a new phase of President George W. Bush’s great Global War on Terror. Phase 1 was Afghanistan and the immediate response to 9/11. Phase 2 was the successful attack on Iraq, Phase 3 marked going on the defensive in Iraq and Phase 4 has been the marking time of the wasted Obama years. Since 2009 Islamic terrorists have pretty much been allowed to run amok, and murder at will.

To describe Obama as the leader of the West is just silly, no offense intended. The West has been like a rudderless ship in the last 7 years. George W. wasn’t perfect, but no one could say they didn’t know where he stood, or that he wasn’t a leader.

Cameron isn’t even in charge of his own party or government, let alone the West, and Hollande has difficulty controlling his own household. They’re a bunch of failures. The only decent leader in the West is Aussie PM Tony Abbott. The Russians don’t know how well off they are with such a magnificent leader as President Putin. Don’t be distracted by the with respect silly inquest currently happening in London by the way – Lt-Col Litvinenko died of peritonitis, not polonium poisoning, and the polonium came out of Iran, not Russia.

Phase Five will see a true Clash of Civilisations. Since Islam is the enemy, albeit as a German ally, we have to attack Islam. That there are many good Moslems is beside the point. Not all Nazis were homicidal, anti-semitic maniacs – some of them were quite charming in fact – but they were nonetheless the enemy. We had to shoot the nice Nazis as well as the nasty ones.

Islam is and always has been an aggressive religion. That was the whole point of setting it up. It was nothing to do with God of course – as I point out in Spyhunter, if Almighty God had founded Islam, the Koran would have been written in English! It was in fact written in Latin, unsurprisingly as its authors were based in the Vatican. So far as I know the Vatican Library still has one of the original versions – not in one book of course, as it took years to write and it was taken to Arabia in parts.

Crusader feature image-Fantasy

It took so long to write in fact that the original author(s) had snuffed it by the time the later chapters came to be written. The true purpose of Islam was to take control of the Holy Land, on behalf of the Bad Guys in the Vatican, which was split, then as now. The Holy Crusades – and the War on Terror is and always has been a Holy Crusade, as well as a geopolitical concept – reflected the split in the Vatican, with the Crusaders being sold out from within their own ranks.

There is only one authorised Holy Book, of course – the King James Bible!

The over-reaction to the comparatively inoffensive Charlie Hebdo cartoons (copies please, Editor!) has been so absurd that it has brought Islam itself into disrepute. The disgraceful attack in Paris was an attack on Reason and Enlightenment, and challenged the fundamental values of the West.

Islam will not be destroyed, but it needs to be defeated, in the way that Don John of Austria did at Lepanto, or the Spaniards whacked the Moors. 2015 will probably see a highpoint for Islamic influence in the West. It is perfectly clear after Charlie Hebdo, if it wasn’t clear before, that Islam and Christianity cannot co-exist in the same society.

That does not mean that law-abiding Moslems in the West should not continue to enjoy the protection of the law. It does mean rethinking mass immigration of Moslems and absurd, self-defeating human rights conventions that hamper an effective counter-terrorist effort.

Movie of the week – American Sniper (2015), dir. Clint Eastwood


Any movie which upsets Michael Moore has to be good. Every reader by now will be aware that this wonderful movie is a bio-pic of the great American sniper Chris Kyle, who did outstanding work in four tours of Iraq.

The movie is controversial, i.e. has upset the left and assorted terrorist sympathisers, because it paints the US military in a good light, and is not afraid to remind the audience that you guys are the Good Guys, and AQI were the Bad Guys. It’s a movie which lives in the real world.

Moore is seriously confused, by the way, about snipers. Sniping is not a safe occupation, like making dodgy documentaries about climate change. The sniper reveals his or her position as soon as he or she shoots. Sniping is not a one-way street.

Chris Kyle was clearly a good man, and an authentic American hero. The movie does not glorify war, but it does say good things about Kyle, the SEALS, and the mission. Great. I am not surprised it is breaking box-office records. Even the Odeon in Aylesbury was fuller than usual for this outstanding movie.

It’s too good a movie to sweep the Oscars, nor will it win critical acclaim, but it should. Brad Cooper’s acting and Clint Eastwood’s direction are outstanding. Clint in particular has excelled himself.

It is not absolutely historically accurate, but no movie is going to be. It’s gets a lot closer to the truth than most movies. Most of the criticisms seem to me to be quibbles. It’s a movie after all, not a documentary.

It’s not just an action war movie. It is a moving study of the pressures war brings to those back home, and on the veterans themselves. It should lead to public pressure for improved support for veterans. It has already started a re-evaluation of Operation Iraqi Freedom, where America’s armed forces did America proud. Nobody served the flag with greater devotion than Chief Kyle. The movie is a fine memorial to him. Go see it.

For the record, I agree with Chris Kyle’s widow, Taya, that the attributed motive of his alleged murderer, who comes up for trial this month, does not hold water. I am far from convinced that we are getting the full picture, but the guy’s entitled to a fair trial, and I’ll hold my piece till the verdict is in. That’s assuming I’m not in jail myself, of course!

February 1st 2015

About: Michael Shrimpton

Michael Shrimpton is a barrister, called to the Bar in London 1983. He is a specialist in National Security and Constitutional Law, Strategic Intelligence and Counterterrorism. He has wide ranging connections both in Western Intelligence agencies and amongst ex-Soviet Bloc agencies.The late Generaloberst Markus Wolf, of the Stasi and DVD, was one of his contacts.Michael has earned respect in the intelligence community for his analysis of previously unacknowledged post-WWII covert operations against the West by the German DVD organization based in Dachau, near Munich, Germany, and its British, French and American client agencies.These continue to the present day, as politicians and the media are too nervous of standing up to them.

Michael was formerly an Adjunct Professor of Intelligence Studies in what was then the Department of National Security, Intelligence and Space Studies at the American Military University, teaching intelligence subjects at Masters level to inter alia serving intelligence officers.He has represented US and Israeli intelligence officers in law and briefed in staffers on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9-11.In the wake of that murderous attack he addressed panels on terrorism in Washington DC and Los Angeles organized by the respected Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs.Fellow panelists included a former head of Special Operations Command and a former Commander of the US Atlantic Fleet.

Michael’s active assistance to Intelligence and Law Enforcement agencies in the Global War on Terror has produced some notable successes, including the exposure of the Abu Ghraib ‚hood‘ photograph as a fake.His work in strategic intelligence has taken him to the Pentagon and he has also met with senior advisors to the President of the Russian Federation, in Moscow, in November 2005. He participated in the Global Strategic Review conference in Geneva in 2005 and was a speaker at both the Intelligence Conference (Intelcon) in 2005, and the Intelligence Summit in 2006, each at Crystal City, near Washington DC.

In 2006 he was flown out to, and flew off from, the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN-65), as part of the US Navy’s Distinguished Visitor Program.She was then working up her air group off the Eastern Seaboard of the United States, before operational deployment to the Persian Gulf.It is comparatively unusual for a foreign civilian to complete a carrier landing and launch cycle.

Michael’s ground-breaking, 700 page intelligence text „Spyhunter: The Secret History of German Intelligence“ was published in England by June Press on April 14th 2014.It is expected to feature on a number of intelligence syllabuses.Pirated copies were circulated widely in a number of intelligence agencies prior to publication.


Veterans Today

‘Islamic State’ head-choppers: The best enemy money can buy

posted by diwini

By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor, for Press TV

Was American reporter James Foley beheaded by the so-called Islamic State?

That is what a video released the other day purports to show. The American mainstream media are in a frenzy, depicting Foley’s execution as the latest extremists’ attack on America.

Newsweek Magazine, a mainstream-Zionist propaganda outlet, issued the screaming headline: “Obama Condemns Brutal Execution of American Journalist.” Reuters, owned by Israel’s founding dynasty, the Rothschilds, headlined its story: “Islamic State message to America: ‘we will drown all of you in blood’.” The radical Zionist tabloid The New York Post, added: “Savages! Islamic State executes American journalist.”

The New York Post headline echoed Zionist agent Pam Geller’s advertising campaign: “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel, defeat jihad.” These racist ads have been placed on buses and in train stations in major American cities. They are part of a concerted effort by Zionist propagandists to convince Americans that Muslims are dark-skinned savages who deserve to be exterminated.

So the video depicting the beheading of James Foley has taken its place as part of a Zionist propaganda campaign designed to defame Islam and keep the US fighting and killing Israel’s enemies. Was that, in fact, why it was created? In a word, yes.

The so-called Islamic State is not what it claims to be. Like the Federal Reserve, which is neither federal nor has any reserves, the Islamic State is neither Islamic nor a state. It is a terrorist group that was created by US intelligence and Zionist-allied mercenaries, trained at CIA bases in Jordan, and unleashed on the people of Syria and Iraq to destabilize those countries in service to Israel.

The realist faction of the US ruling elite, represented by President Obama and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is genuinely alarmed by the rise of Islamic State. These realists believe the Middle East has already been sufficiently destabilized, so now it is time to move on to the real struggle against Russia, China, and the rising BRICS nations. They are concerned that Islamic State is becoming a Frankenstein’s monster that could wreak blowback on its creators.

But the ultra-Zionist faction, represented by AIPAC, JINSA, FDD (formerly PNAC) and the neoconservative dual citizens who dominate the Republican Party, loves Islamic State. For them, Islamic State is the best enemy that American taxpayers’ money can buy. It is the perfect vehicle for demonizing Islam and sealing the US-Israel relationship in American blood.

These neoconservatives follow the advice of their guru, Leo Strauss: Since only a hated foe brings people together, it is necessary to create an enemy – even a mythical one – to foster national unity. (Or, in this case, US-Israeli binational unity.)

The enemy’s nature, even his actual existence, is irrelevant. What is important to the Straussians is that blood-drenched, emotionally-evocative enemy images should saturate the mass mind.

The video purporting to show the decapitation of James Foley is a classic example of neocon hate propaganda. It is the sort of “Two Minutes Hate” event satirized in George Orwell’s book 1984, in which citizens are whipped into such a frenzy of loathing by enemy images that they sometimes physically assault their telescreen.

Though Israel regularly murders journalists, few Americans are aware of this fact, because the Zionist-dominated media does not saturate the mass mind with images of evil Israelis committing atrocities – even though Israel is the per capita atrocity capital of the world. The Orwellian “Two Minutes of Hate” propaganda treatment is reserved for Muslims…or people posing as Muslims.

So-called Islamic State is in the latter category. Even al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri has called Islamic State a false-flag group.

Former al-Qaeda commander Nabil Na’eem agrees. He even goes one step further, arguing that al-Zawahiri is a dupe, and that al-Qaeda and its allied al-Nusra Front are also part of a Western/Zionist destabilization operation targeting the whole Islamic world. Na’eem has identified neoconservative Zionist MI-6 advisor Bernard Lewis as the intellectual godfather of the Fourth Generation Warfare plan to manufacture a bogus “Islamic terrorist threat” in order to balkanize Middle Eastern states into tiny, powerless statelets that could never threaten Israel.

Na’eem even referenced Netanyahu’s “Clean Break” plan and its successor, PNAC’s “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” which was published on September 11th, 2000. In that document, the neoconservatives called for a “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” Exactly one year later, they got one.

Since there are now dozens of thriving professional 9/11 truth groups, led by, perhaps Nabil Na’eem should start a new one: “Former al-Qaeda Commanders for 9/11 Truth.”

Just how deep does this “fake Islamic terror” rabbit hole go?

Egyptian media outlet Egy-Press is reporting that Islamic State’s self-proclaimed caliph, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, is an Israeli Mossad agent whose real name is Shimon Eliot. According to Egy-Press, Eliot a.k.a. al-Baghdadi “has cooperated with US, British and Israeli intelligence to create an organization capable of attracting terrorist extremists around the world to one place.”

Perhaps that would explain why Islamic State (formerly called ISIL and other names) has never attacked Israel – and has even pointedly refused to verbally support HAMAS, arguing that Muslims should not resist the Zionist entity occupying the Islamic holy land of Palestine. Instead, they prefer to attack Israel’s enemies…while simultaneously demonizing Islam in the court of American and global public opinion.

That is, they are doing what al-Qaeda does, only more so. Like Boko Haram, Islamic State hardly bothers to conceal the fact that it is a false-flag group whose mission is to conduct Zionist public relations stunts.

The world’s Muslims should not just repudiate Islamic State; they should speak loudly and clearly, with one voice, emphasizing that IS is a bogus group created, trained and funded by the enemies of Islam, designed to wage Fourth Generation Warfare against Islam and Muslims.

Quelle & Kommentare: Veterans Today

Verheerende Interventionsspiralen

posted by diwini


Wenn der Westen IS (und all die anderen Terror-Organisationen, die sich angeblich auf den Islam berufen) wirklich ernsthaft bekämpfen will, sollte er zu allererst ihre ideologischen und finanziellen Quellen trockenlegen tun. Diese liegen wohl zumeist in Saudi-Arabien, Qatar und den Vereinigten Emiraten.


 Von Dagmar Metzger, Christian Bayer und Steffen Schäfer, Liberale Vereinigung

Die militärischen Erfolge einer Terroristengruppe, die im Norden Syriens und des Iraks einen fundamental-islamischen Staat errichtet haben, scheinen es in den Augen der Bundesregierung (und nicht nur in ihren Augen) notwendig zu machen, die Kurden im Irak mit Waffen zu versorgen. Angesichts der Erfolge, die militärische Interventionen (von Sanktionen über Waffenlieferungen bis hin zu aktiver Kriegsbeteiligung) des Westens bisher zeitigten, darf man sich allerdings fragen, warum Politiker so schwer aus Fehlern zu lernen scheinen.

Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland gab unter der damaligen rot-grünen Regierung ihre außenpolitische Zurückhaltung im Zuge der Kosovokrise erstmals auf. Es waren insbesondere die Minister Joschka Fischer und Rudolf Scharping, die unter dem Motto „Auschwitz verhindern“ militärische Aktionen forderten. Die Bilder freilich, welche suggerierten, die Serben hätten im Kosovo Konzentrationslager errichtet, waren durch britische und US-amerikanische Kamerateams gestellt worden, der berühmte „Hufeisenplan“, dessen Existenz nie bewiesen wurde, war eine willkommene Begründung des deutschen Verteidigungsministers für den NATO- Einsatz. Heute müssen die KFOR-Soldaten immer noch durch ihre Präsenz ein Wiederaufflammen der Kämpfe verhindern. Das Kosovo selbst wurde zur wichtigsten Transitroute für den europäischen Heroinschmuggel und geriet jüngst in die Schlagzeilen aufgrund von schwunghaftem Organ- und Menschenhandel.

Auch im neuen Jahrtausend waren die Interventionen kaum erfolgreicher: Nachdem man in Afghanistan die Taliban vertrieben hatte, hoffte die internationale Gemeinschaft auf eine schnelle Stabilisierung des Landes – die einzigen Dinge aber, die sich in Afghanistan seitdem stabilisiert haben, sind korrupte Regime lokaler Warlords, eine zweistellige Inflationsrate und die Rohopiumproduktion. Seitdem dreht sich die Interventionsspirale schneller: Der Irak wurde 2003 von den USA (und einigen Verbündeten) unter dem Vorwand, Saddam Hussein plane den Einsatz von chemischen Massenvernichtungswaffen, erobert. Damit wurde die Büchse der Pandora endgültig geöffnet und die gesamte Region destabilisiert. Die IS-Terroristen sind ein Echo dieser Intervention. Sie formierten sich zusammen mit Al-Quaida, weiteren Terror- und normalen Widerstandsgruppen im Kampf gegen die Besatzer. Da sie aber im Irak nicht wirklich willkommen waren und die Schiiten überhaupt wenig Interesse an dem schlichten Wertekatalog der damals noch als AQI (Al- Quaida Irak) bzw. ISI (Islamischer Staat Irak) bekannten Gruppe hatten, dürften sie hoch erfreut gewesen sein, als sich in Syrien ein neues Betätigungsfeld auftat.

In Libyen entwickelte sich im Zuge des „arabischen Frühlings“ (der sich eher als Renaissance der Steinzeitislamisten entpuppte) ein Aufstand gegen den lokalen Diktator und sein Regime. Umgehend wurde Gaddafi von westlichen Medien und Politikern zum blutrünstigen Tyrannen und „Irren von Tripolis“ stilisiert. Das war zwar nicht ganz falsch, hatte die meisten westlichen Staatschefs aber noch kurz davor nicht davon abgehalten, Freundlichkeiten mit Gaddafi auszutauschen und ihm kräftig die Hände zu schütteln. Nun aber wurden Interventionen gegen den alten Kumpel geplant. Nachdem die UN eine Flugverbotszone abgesegnet hatten, machten sich die Franzosen und Briten an die Umsetzung derselben. Bodentruppen des Diktators, seine Behausungen und Hauptquartiere wurden bombardiert. Da den europäischen Bombern allerdings schon nach drei Tagen die Munition ausging, mussten doch wieder nolens volens die USA ran und Gaddafi endgültig vom Thron stoßen. Damit aber zogen natürlich nicht Frieden, Freiheit und Gerechtigkeit in Libyen ein, sondern al-Quaida in die Hauptstadt Tripolis. Im Rest des Landes weitete sich der Bürgerkrieg aus. Heute ist das ehemals höchstentwickelte Land Afrikas Kampfgebiet zahlreicher verfeindeter Milizen, aber immerhin gibt es nun endlich eine Zentralbank. Dass sich die damalige schwarz-gelbe Bundesregierung nicht an der Intervention beteiligte, sondern sich sogar dagegen aussprach, ist einer der wenigen Verdienste des Außenministers Westerwelle.

Natürlich hatte auch die Intervention in Libyen ein Nachspiel, dieses Mal in Mali. Die zahlreichen islamistischen Krieger wollten auch in anderen Regionen ihre Version vom Wort des Propheten verkünden und zogen umgehend weiter in den zentralafrikanischen Staat. Da sie in den Waffenkammern Gaddafis jede Menge Ausrüstung fanden,…

Quelle & weiter: MMnews